Program on Negotiation newsletter at the Harvard Law School www. Based from the reading of the class, Reading 3. The objective of the union and the company must be realistic as to the long range revision of the collective bargaining agreement. As the business merging operation prosper, labor management on the other hand confuses the labor union as to who will be in-charge in some merged work positions.
Furthermore, objectives must not be bias towards the company only or towards one group of personnel union. A good agreement between parties must last at least longer than the recent dilemma of the case. Collective Bargaining Explained Theory: The company believes that the success of the new merged airline company is relying from the positive business unity between the two airline personnel.
Several revisions are to be met by the company for the job satisfaction grievances of the union.
As the case reveals the endless argument between the two parties. The League of Flight Attendants LFA has the big participation in the negotiation towards the company knowing that the LFA is the recognized body of the workers towards the company.
The union is asking to permit the flight attendants to have pay during duty rigs. Email Other Apps Airline business expands more these days not only to the elite star alliance flights but also to the low cost airlines and small airline companies accommodating the middle income customers which has more volume of passengers during travel pick seasons.
Both teams, the company and the union can utilize the three main techniques in thriving a conflict. Board of Education US Dist.
Trevis, Connelly, and Laszlo pp. The company is not dealing with one personnel but a body of personnel represented by the union. In this case, teams are represented by the company top management and the union.
In such manner, collective bargaining needs to be revised from time to time but avoiding frequent revisions will avoid unstable management of personnel. The objective of the negotiation is to have at least a lasting negotiation contract between parties.
The company has to revise the contracts of the workers as to the new policy of the merged companies. Amos Tversky Prospect theory covers the framing and loss aversion, Risk Seeking, Source dependence, escalation of commitment, and overconfidence.
One, is seek familiarity, not friendship, discuss differences in advance, and assign roles and responsibilities.
As the two companies RCA and MCA are in their merging status, management dilemma between the two companies creates a havoc initiated by the labor union.
The new management must adhere to the clamor of the union granting the bargaining agreement being executed are all new since the two companies are merging.Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines: A union perspective2 - What did the union do to prepare for negotiations?
How did the preparation impact the. MGT Case Study Collective Bargaining At Magic Carpet Airlines: A Union Perspective Please remember to use at least two outside sources.
Show your sources as in-text citations and also in the references section. Introduction Magic Carpet Airlines (MCA) was a regional airline that was established in MCA grew to serve 18 cities in its first 26 years as a company. InMCA purchased River City Airlines (RCA), an airline that was then serving 12 cities%(47).
In JanuaryMagic Carpet Air purchased River City Airlines and merged the two operations. The joining of these two regional airlines created a small “national” airline (defined as a carrier with sales between $ million and $1 billion) with sales of $, in Case Study – Magic Carpet Airlines Week 4 September 22, 1.
What did the union do to prepare for negotiations? What additional sources of information might it have used? Case 4: Collective Bargaining at Magic Carpet Airlines: A Union Perspective The case that we are discussing is a negotiation that happened between the League of Flight attendants and MCA negotiating team regarding the satisfaction of the employees of the terms of 93%(14).Download